Bill Clinton never tires of proving how unfit he was to be President of the United States. That he could be re-elected is a never ending rebuke to the political skills of the moderate wing of the Republican party.
Now he is saying that it was the right wing talk show hosts that were responsible for the horrific bombing of the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City back on April 19, 1995. It was the charged rhetoric of Rush Limbaugh and other conservatives that drove Timothy McVeigh mad, stark raving mad I tell you, so mad that McVeigh built a humongous fertilizer bomb, that defied all the known rules of physics that pertain to explosives, and brought down the Murrah Building.
Since he brought up the subject, maybe he would like to reopen the investigation and get a few questions answered. So, tell us Bill;
1. How can a fertilizer bomb do that much damage when explosives experts such as Ret. Brig. General Benton Partin and Dr. Roger Raubach have said it is physically impossible?
2. Why was Brig. General Benton Partin never allowed (please read this link--it will really turn your stomach, Bill, and, no, there aren't enough sexy interns in the world to make you forget what you did) to offer testimony at the trial?
3. Why were Congressional investigations into Whitewater, Waco, Ruby Ridge, Mena, ATF conduct, and the death of Vincent Foster suddenly put on the back burner after the Oklahoma City bombing?
4. Judges and other vip's were warned not to come to the building that morning. Why wasn't that warning passed on to kids in the pre-school on the second floor?
5. Aside from the Murrah building explosion, which the official version of right wing planning and execution is laughably unbelievable, how many deaths have been attributed to right wing militias? Zero?
6. How many deaths have been associated with close proximity to you, Bill?
That is such a good question, I'll help you out with some links. This one links over 200 deaths to you, and it's alphabetical so you can look up your friends by name. This next list only contains 103 names. The next list is for 90 names so you can see I'm trying to be nice here, and look for the most positive information I can get. You get the idea, Bill. People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones at the tea party movement or talk radio.
For more information on the Oklahoma City Bombing read this excellent link from "The Rag Blog or this one from a policeman's investigative perspective, "riflewarrior." And one more for good measure from John Dougherty about local news sources.
Posts
2 comments:
1. It is very possible--the FBI and federal experts said so after a full investigation.
2. They aren't credible--they passed the Kook Test with flying colors.
3. Priorities.
4. What kids? No kids died in the bombing--check your facts.
5. How about Waco and Koresh?
6. Bill Clinton walks on water as far as I'm concerned. He does not need to answer any of your silly questions.
Thanks for reading the column and thanks for taking the time to post.
Regarding 1. The FBI and the federal experts worked for Clinton and Janet Reno. The physics of the blast means that the blast did not have sufficient force by the time it got to the columns to take out the support columns in the building, but cutting charges inside the building would have done so easily. Please, read the links. Blind acceptance of official sources is the quickest path to slavery.
2. Gen. Partin and Roger Raubach are not kooks, they are experts, and they and a host of other experts insist a fertilizer bomb couldn't have done it. Again, please take a little more time and read the links.
3. Yes, a bomb blast was a convenient change of priorities away from the courruption of Bill Clinton. That's what the article is about.
4. What kids? I wish as much as you do that it weren't so, but acccording to Wikipedia the blast killed 19 children in the building under the age of 6 years of age.
5. What about Waco and Koresh? Not quite sure what you're looking for in that question, but that is where the Clinton regime used brutal force to take out a bunch of eccentrics.
6. Bill Clinton does not walk on water. Please, don't take this the wrong way, but you're getting him confused with your real Saviour. If Bill Clinton is going to make silly accusations about talk radio and conservatives, then he'd better be prepared to answer extremely important (not silly) questions about the courruption and death that surrounded his eight years in office.
Post a Comment